Isn't the performance also built on top of pufferfish?#1155
Closed
Soapy7261 wants to merge 2 commits into
Closed
Conversation
Contributor
|
Sure, we use the patches from Pufferfish. But Paper does the most work (starlight, dfu rewrite and chunk rewrite + many other optimalisations). Also more people know Paper so it just makes sense to have them there. |
Author
|
perhaps it should instead be paper & pufferfish? |
Soapy7261
changed the title
Member
|
We aren’t built on top of Pufferfish like we are on Paper, it’s all in the semantics. It’s the same thing how Pufferfish includes Petal patches yet claims to be built on top of Papaer. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I mean, i could be wrong but since purpur has patches from pufferfish i thought it would also be built on top pufferfish (at least somewhat)